Ann Bland married Robert Elliot, son of Charles and Lydia (Bailey) Elliot, and Robert and Ann in turn were the parents of our ancestor William Elliot of Toronto, pharmacist and businessman. Here are some excerpts from the will of Ann's natural or adoptive father Stephen Bland, which was proved in London on January 21, 1811. The executors were James Bland, Stephen's son, and Robert Elliot, his son-in-law.
"GLORY TO GOD ON HIGH. I Stephen Bland of the Hamlet of Hammersmith in the parish of ffulham County of Middlesex being of sound disposing mind and memory blessed be God for the same do make constitute & appoint this my last will & Testament in manner and form following viz. ffirst I desire that all my just debts and funeral expenses be justly paid by my Executors herewithafter named first I give and bequeath to my daughter Ann Elliot wife of Robert Elliot two copyhold houses now in the occupation of Thomas Etherington & John Marbarill ? the (cross or crops?) land adjoining unto great Church ? in the Hamlet afore with the gardens and appurts thereunto belonging for her whole and sole use independent of her husband and not subject to his control debts or engagements and after the death of my daughter Ann Elliot I give the said houses unto her husband Robert Elliot during his natural life after the death of the said Robert Elliot the above two houses to become the property of John Elliot & Robert Elliot being sons of the said Robert Elliot & Ann Elliot the said John Elliot to ??? of the said two houses provided the said Ann Elliot should survive her husband Robert Elliot and her two sons...the said houses to become the property of the remaining Sons of her body lawfully begotten share and share alike I likewise give and bequeath unto my daughter Harriot Pontifex wife of Daniel Pontifex silversmith in St. John's Square in the parish of St. James Clerkenwell two houses or Tenements in short laws in the Hamlet afore. now in the occupation of John (B??k) John Sprawbury subject to the same rules...as my daughter Ann Elliot & Robert Elliot her husband and observing that the said Daniel Pontifex pulls down or causes to be pulled down for....a certain pair of buildings ? by one of Mr. Pontifex's tenants within twelve months after my demise in failure thereof my will is that the above two houses to go to my daughter Ann Elliot and her heirs for ever also I give unto my son John Thomas Bland son of my first wife Elizabeth Bland two houses or Tenements situate in short laws afore. and now in the occupation of James Bland and Joseph ? for and during his natural life but if the said John Thomas Bland should die without issue then the said two houses I give unto my grandson John Elliot and his heirs for ever I also give & bequeath unto my son Edward Bland two tenements situate in short laws afore. & now in the occupation of Thomas ? and James Hampton during his natural life and at his demise to go unto my son James Bland and his heirs for ever also I give unto my son James Bland two houses known by the name of Bardon (?) plane in the Hamlet afore. and now in the occupation of the Rev. Mr. Raffles & Madame Ann de Ste Hippolite with all & ? of the (provisions?) and appurts thereunto belonging to enjoy & hold the same for him and his heirs for ever subject to the following Restrictions that the said James Bland shall let unto Mrs. Ann and Elizabeth Watts two rooms and the use of the ?? during their natural lives out of the house now occupied by Madame Ann de Ste. Hippolite I also constitute and appoint my son James Bland and my son in law Robert Elliot Executors of this my last will and testament & that my son James Bland shall not be thrown out of his house so long as he chooses to remain in the same paying rent for the same Stephn Bland
Signed sealed and delivered in the person of us whose names are herein written this twenty-first day of August in the Year of Our Lord 1810. James Moody William Duncombe William Newell."
In this will Stephen Bland names Ann Elliot and Harriot Pontifex as his daughters. However, it is unclear whether they were his natural or adoptive children. There is a transcribed letter from Henry Lake, Harriot (Bland) Pontifex's grandson, on the website Char's Broken Branches which suggests that Harriot, at least, was adopted:
"My grandmother was Harriot Bland and she was born in London. Her parents died when she was young and she was brought up by her uncle, Mr. Bland, who kept a sword cutler's shop at Charing Cross London and supplied the Royal Family and officers of the army and navy with swords belts and Gold Lace Epaulettes...".
This will names a number of other children (John Thomas Bland, Edward Bland and James Bland) and two grandsons, John and Robert Elliot. It also makes some provision for a Madame Ann de Ste. Hippolite and Elizabeth Watts. It names a "first wife:" Elizabeth, suggesting that there is also a second, unnamed wife (who likely was deceased at the time the will was made as she is not mentioned). It does not give us Stephen's occupation but he did have quite a bit of land to leave his heirs, indicating that he was a man of means, which is consistent with the information in Mr. Lake's letter. I'm hoping that this information can help us find out more about Stephen and his family.
Showing posts with label Ann Elliot. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ann Elliot. Show all posts
Sunday, March 9, 2014
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
From England to Ontario: Robert and Ann Elliot
In a previous post I wrote about William Elliot of Toronto and his amazing career. Right now I'm in the process of trying to discover more about William's parents, his siblings and his early environment. So far my research has provided me with an intriguing mix of definite information and information that's probably about the family but isn't specific enough to know for sure.
One of the cool things about William is that he's one of our only Canadian ancestors to have been born in England. Hammersmith, to be exact, which is now part of London but at the time of his birth was referred to as a "Hamlet". William's entry in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography provides the exact date (December 22, 1812) and place of his birth. Armed with this information, it was pretty easy to find his baptismal record.
This document gives us the name of both of William's parents (Robert and Ann), which is great. (It also explains why William gave his oldest son the name Robert). It doesn't give us Ann's maiden name, which is slightly less great, since Robert, Ann, and Elliot are all pretty common names. However, it does give us Robert Elliot's occupation, which is "currier" (a currier was a leather-worker).
The Dictionary of Canadian Biography has this to say about William's early life:
"William Elliot was educated at a boarding-school in London. His family immigrated to Dundas, Upper Canada, and he followed when he had completed his schooling at the age of 15. In 1834 he took up land near the town and started farming..."
And his obituary in the Globe (Tuesday, June 6, 1893) confirms that he was born in Hammersmith in December 1812 and also mentions that "Mr. John Elliot, for over 30 years clerk of the county court, was his eldest brother.".
So, these reliable sources of information tell us that William was the son of Robert and Ann Elliot, he had an older brother named John, his father was a currier, which put him in the tradesman class, they lived in Harrowsmith and they came to Canada before 1832. We also know that William went to boarding school, which indicates that the family had some money.
The Bishop's transcripts from the St. Paul, Hammersmith church show that William had at least three sisters, two of whom died young (one died before William was even born). Robert and Ann Elliot were the parents of Eleanor Elliot, born August 29, 1804, who died at age 5 in May, 1809; Mary Elliot, who was born on April 8, 1806; and Sarah Elliot, born October 10, 1809 and died at age 7 in May of 1817, when William would have been five years old. I haven't yet found a birth or baptismal record for John, William's older brother.
Here's where things get more conjectural. There are more records for a Robert Elliot in Middlesex, but I'm not sure if any of these are the right Robert Elliot. Here's what else I have:
These two records are from a database of land tax records in the greater London area. The first image is from 1825, and it shows that Robert Elliot is a tenant of a Mssr. Salter in Hammersmith (the place is named on an earlier page). His rent is 30 pounds (a year, I would imagine) and the tax on the property is 1 pound.
The second record is again for Hammersmith, in the year 1819. Robert Elliot has the same landlord. We don't know the rent, but the tax is 1 pound 5 shillings. Mr. Salter appears to own several properties in this area. At the very top of the page in red, it says "Angel Row".
Unfortunately these records don't list an occupation or names of other family members, so although the name and place matches up it's hard to make a definite identification.
This next record is from a database of duties paid for apprentice's indentures in the UK. In May 1798, a Robert Elliot, Currier, who lived in St. Martin's in the Fields, is recorded as having an apprentice named George Priestly. St. Martin's in the Fields is in Middlesex, and, like Hammersmith, is now part of London. This record has the right name and occupation but a different location. It's earlier than our previous records, so it's possible that Robert and his family moved to Hammersmith some time after May 1798. However, it's also possible that it's a different Robert Elliot.
Now we come to my all-time favourite document for the Elliot family. I really hope this is the right Robert Elliot--this paper is so beautiful and historic! You can even see the original seals. It comes from a database called "London, England, Freedom of the City Admission Papers" and is dated 1785. It's an apprenticeship indenture contract between Robert Elliot, "son of Charles Elliot of Hayes in the County of Middlesex, Victualler" and Thomas Burton of Newport Street, Currier of London. The apprenticeship is for seven years (which is a standard length of time) during which Robert promises to faithfully serve, keep the secrets of, and not waste the goods of his master. He is prohibited from "Fornication...Matrimony...play[ing] at Cards, Dice, Tables, or any other unlawful Games, whereby his said Master may have any Loss." For the fee of thirty pounds, Thomas Burton promises to teach Robert "the Art and Mystery of a Currier".
Robert Elliot has signed the document himself, indicating that he is at least somewhat educated. This record also gives us his father's name, his father's profession and the original family location, giving us the possibility of going back one more generation, if this is indeed our Robert Elliot. Interestingly, the database listing apprentice's indentures in the UK indicates that Thomas Burton had one other apprentice, a John Elliot. The document for John's apprenticeship is dated 1783. Was this an older brother of Robert's? All of these records are for the Middlesex area, but as my husband points out, that's a big and very populated space and Elliot is not an uncommon name.
I'm always interested, when learning about people who uprooted themselves to move to Canada or the U.S., in the question of what motivated them to immigrate. I think that we don't always appreciate what that decision meant for people in earlier times--there was obviously no e-mail, no skype, no air travel--even letters took months to arrive. For most people, immigration was a serious and deep separation from family and community. In general, with the exception of certain religious groups who move to gain more freedom, historians believe that most people coming to the new world did it for economic reasons. Although I don't know precisely when the Elliot family moved, I'm guessing it would have been in the 1820s or early 1830s. Now, the fact that William was in boarding school when the rest of his family moved and joined them later indicates to me that Robert and Ann must have already had some money. Why did Robert decide to leave an established business he had spent seven years training for, close to one of the most exciting cities in the world, to become a farmer in Eramosa township? And one who had to clear his own land, besides! I'm guessing industrialization had something to do with it. There's a lot more to learn about this fascinating family.
One of the cool things about William is that he's one of our only Canadian ancestors to have been born in England. Hammersmith, to be exact, which is now part of London but at the time of his birth was referred to as a "Hamlet". William's entry in the Dictionary of Canadian Biography provides the exact date (December 22, 1812) and place of his birth. Armed with this information, it was pretty easy to find his baptismal record.
This document gives us the name of both of William's parents (Robert and Ann), which is great. (It also explains why William gave his oldest son the name Robert). It doesn't give us Ann's maiden name, which is slightly less great, since Robert, Ann, and Elliot are all pretty common names. However, it does give us Robert Elliot's occupation, which is "currier" (a currier was a leather-worker).
The Dictionary of Canadian Biography has this to say about William's early life:
"William Elliot was educated at a boarding-school in London. His family immigrated to Dundas, Upper Canada, and he followed when he had completed his schooling at the age of 15. In 1834 he took up land near the town and started farming..."
And his obituary in the Globe (Tuesday, June 6, 1893) confirms that he was born in Hammersmith in December 1812 and also mentions that "Mr. John Elliot, for over 30 years clerk of the county court, was his eldest brother.".
So, these reliable sources of information tell us that William was the son of Robert and Ann Elliot, he had an older brother named John, his father was a currier, which put him in the tradesman class, they lived in Harrowsmith and they came to Canada before 1832. We also know that William went to boarding school, which indicates that the family had some money.
The Bishop's transcripts from the St. Paul, Hammersmith church show that William had at least three sisters, two of whom died young (one died before William was even born). Robert and Ann Elliot were the parents of Eleanor Elliot, born August 29, 1804, who died at age 5 in May, 1809; Mary Elliot, who was born on April 8, 1806; and Sarah Elliot, born October 10, 1809 and died at age 7 in May of 1817, when William would have been five years old. I haven't yet found a birth or baptismal record for John, William's older brother.
 |
| Baptismal record for Mary Elliot, daughter of Robert and Ann Elliot of Poppins Court, born September 9, 1800, baptized October 5, 1800. St. Bride's Fleet Street Church, London, England. |
Here's where things get more conjectural. There are more records for a Robert Elliot in Middlesex, but I'm not sure if any of these are the right Robert Elliot. Here's what else I have:
These two records are from a database of land tax records in the greater London area. The first image is from 1825, and it shows that Robert Elliot is a tenant of a Mssr. Salter in Hammersmith (the place is named on an earlier page). His rent is 30 pounds (a year, I would imagine) and the tax on the property is 1 pound.
Unfortunately these records don't list an occupation or names of other family members, so although the name and place matches up it's hard to make a definite identification.
This next record is from a database of duties paid for apprentice's indentures in the UK. In May 1798, a Robert Elliot, Currier, who lived in St. Martin's in the Fields, is recorded as having an apprentice named George Priestly. St. Martin's in the Fields is in Middlesex, and, like Hammersmith, is now part of London. This record has the right name and occupation but a different location. It's earlier than our previous records, so it's possible that Robert and his family moved to Hammersmith some time after May 1798. However, it's also possible that it's a different Robert Elliot.
Now we come to my all-time favourite document for the Elliot family. I really hope this is the right Robert Elliot--this paper is so beautiful and historic! You can even see the original seals. It comes from a database called "London, England, Freedom of the City Admission Papers" and is dated 1785. It's an apprenticeship indenture contract between Robert Elliot, "son of Charles Elliot of Hayes in the County of Middlesex, Victualler" and Thomas Burton of Newport Street, Currier of London. The apprenticeship is for seven years (which is a standard length of time) during which Robert promises to faithfully serve, keep the secrets of, and not waste the goods of his master. He is prohibited from "Fornication...Matrimony...play[ing] at Cards, Dice, Tables, or any other unlawful Games, whereby his said Master may have any Loss." For the fee of thirty pounds, Thomas Burton promises to teach Robert "the Art and Mystery of a Currier".
Robert Elliot has signed the document himself, indicating that he is at least somewhat educated. This record also gives us his father's name, his father's profession and the original family location, giving us the possibility of going back one more generation, if this is indeed our Robert Elliot. Interestingly, the database listing apprentice's indentures in the UK indicates that Thomas Burton had one other apprentice, a John Elliot. The document for John's apprenticeship is dated 1783. Was this an older brother of Robert's? All of these records are for the Middlesex area, but as my husband points out, that's a big and very populated space and Elliot is not an uncommon name.
 |
| Map of Hammersmith, 1746, when it was still called a "Hamlet". |
I'm always interested, when learning about people who uprooted themselves to move to Canada or the U.S., in the question of what motivated them to immigrate. I think that we don't always appreciate what that decision meant for people in earlier times--there was obviously no e-mail, no skype, no air travel--even letters took months to arrive. For most people, immigration was a serious and deep separation from family and community. In general, with the exception of certain religious groups who move to gain more freedom, historians believe that most people coming to the new world did it for economic reasons. Although I don't know precisely when the Elliot family moved, I'm guessing it would have been in the 1820s or early 1830s. Now, the fact that William was in boarding school when the rest of his family moved and joined them later indicates to me that Robert and Ann must have already had some money. Why did Robert decide to leave an established business he had spent seven years training for, close to one of the most exciting cities in the world, to become a farmer in Eramosa township? And one who had to clear his own land, besides! I'm guessing industrialization had something to do with it. There's a lot more to learn about this fascinating family.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)